Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   BBWForums.net - NBA, NFL, MLB Sports Forum > NBA Team Forums > Central Division > Indiana Pacers

Indiana Pacers Indiana Pacers Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2010, 10:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
PFF
Senior Member
 
PFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Naptown
Age: 17
Posts: 3,583   (View Stats)
Credits: 9,951
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default 130 points

130-115 win over the Raptors.

Granger: 23 points
Murphy: 20 points
Hibbert: 18 points
Watson: 15 points
Rush: 13 points
Head: 13 points
Dunleavy: 12 points

That's 7 players in double figures, and check out the next two:

Jones: 8 points
Price: 8 points

This is the kind of all-around, high scoring that I thought would make us a playoff team this year. Too bad it didn't show up until halfway through the season.
__________________
PFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-02-2010, 10:42 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BasX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Niagara Falls, Ontario
Age: 20
Posts: 1,354   (View Stats)
Credits: 7,658
Toronto Raptors
Send a message via MSN to BasX
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

Considering only 4 players showed out for Toronto with 2 starters hurt, I'm surprised we didn't lose by more. Indiana hit everything as well. Overall, Indiana isn't that good, but got us on a very bad night, without DD and Hedo.
__________________
BasX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 10:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
EDELMAN -- Welker Jr.
 
Perk Is A Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 9,157   (View Stats)
Credits: 12,476
Boston Celtics
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

But you were playing Toronto and still allowed 115 points. The fact that they scored 130 has more to do with the pace of the game rather than talent (other then Granger, whose a stud)
Perk Is A Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 10:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
PFF
Senior Member
 
PFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Naptown
Age: 17
Posts: 3,583   (View Stats)
Credits: 9,951
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

Overall we are good - it just hasn't worked out this season. In theory Granger should score 20 a night. Jones, Dunleavy, Hibbert, and Murphy should score 15 each. Rush, Head, and Watson should score 10 each. That is 120 points right there.
__________________
PFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 10:48 PM   #5 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Draft Analyst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Marquis Gilstrap Baby
Age: 16
Posts: 4,718   (View Stats)
Credits: 2,608
Golden State Warriors
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

16-32.
__________________
Draft Analyst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 10:53 PM   #6 (permalink)
PFF
Senior Member
 
PFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Naptown
Age: 17
Posts: 3,583   (View Stats)
Credits: 9,951
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

Hence "it hasn't worked out this season". Injuries have played a role, I think chemistry has been an issue until January, and Granger has taken a step back this year. There's no question in my mind that this team had potential, which is why I was hyping them at the beginning of the season. This game only reinforced my point. Things don't always work out I guess.
__________________
PFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 10:55 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BasX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Niagara Falls, Ontario
Age: 20
Posts: 1,354   (View Stats)
Credits: 7,658
Toronto Raptors
Send a message via MSN to BasX
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

Besides the Killer Bs (lame nickname wtf), everything that could have went wrong did. We knew we'd lose this game (at least I did), nothing to get upset about. The 130 isn't as bad as it looks. I could go on but meh, down game, move on.
__________________
BasX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 10:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BasX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Niagara Falls, Ontario
Age: 20
Posts: 1,354   (View Stats)
Credits: 7,658
Toronto Raptors
Send a message via MSN to BasX
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PFF View Post
Overall we are good - it just hasn't worked out this season. In theory Granger should score 20 a night. Jones, Dunleavy, Hibbert, and Murphy should score 15 each. Rush, Head, and Watson should score 10 each. That is 120 points right there.
Also, holy fuck on the averages. Way too high. WAY TOO HIGH.
__________________
BasX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 11:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
PFF
Senior Member
 
PFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Naptown
Age: 17
Posts: 3,583   (View Stats)
Credits: 9,951
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

Not really. Those are the numbers those players should put up on average. Tell me which ones are too high? The only ones I think you can make a case for are Jones and Head. Remove 5 points from Jones and Head and add it to Granger and you still have 120.
__________________
PFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 11:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
PFF
Senior Member
 
PFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Naptown
Age: 17
Posts: 3,583   (View Stats)
Credits: 9,951
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

And I forgot to mention that when Hansbrough returns that should be another 5-10 points. Scoring 110-120 points a night will put you into the playoff race. All I'm saying that even though it hasn't worked out that way, it wasn't a crazy thought at the beginning of the year.
__________________
PFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 11:32 PM   #11 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
BasX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Niagara Falls, Ontario
Age: 20
Posts: 1,354   (View Stats)
Credits: 7,658
Toronto Raptors
Send a message via MSN to BasX
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

Expecting 120 a night is way too much to expect.
__________________
BasX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 12:29 AM   #12 (permalink)
PFF
Senior Member
 
PFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Naptown
Age: 17
Posts: 3,583   (View Stats)
Credits: 9,951
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

Probably. But last season we played at the second fastest pace in the NBA and averaged near 110 ppg over the 2nd half of the season. Again, it didn't work out in hindsight, but it was there.
__________________
PFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 12:39 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Halifax
Posts: 2,054   (View Stats)
Credits: 2,816
Toronto Raptors
Send a message via AIM to Chris Send a message via MSN to Chris
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

You're assuming Granger stops jacking up shots enough for those players to even have the opportunity to score that many points.
__________________



The Championship Formula:
Quote:
Originally Posted by PFF View Post
Overall we are good - it just hasn't worked out this season. In theory Granger should score 20 a night. Jones, Dunleavy, Hibbert, and Murphy should score 15 each. Rush, Head, and Watson should score 10 each. That is 120 points right there.

Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 01:48 AM   #14 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 9,964   (View Stats)
Credits: 11,765
Cleveland Cavaliers
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

So if we are going to do theories...

LeBron - 35 PPG
Mo - 25 PPG
Shaq- 20 PPG
West - 20 PPG
Z - 15 PPG
Andy V - 15 PPG
Parker -15 PPG
Moon 10 PPG
Bench - 15 PPG

160 PPG. Cavs > Pacers.

In all seriously, PFF made my head hurt and made me lose some hope in humanity.
__________________
2008 Fantasy Baseball Champion
2008 BBW Fantasy Football Champion
2008 BBW League 2 Fantasy Football Runner Up

2009 BBW Fantasy NCAA Tourney Pick Em Champion
2009 Fantasy NCAA Tourney Pick Em Champion
Krenzel16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 03:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8,205   (View Stats)
Credits: 33,575
Toronto Raptors
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krenzel16 View Post
So if we are going to do theories...

LeBron - 35 PPG
Mo - 25 PPG
Shaq- 20 PPG
West - 20 PPG
Z - 15 PPG
Andy V - 15 PPG
Parker -15 PPG
Moon 10 PPG
Bench - 15 PPG

160 PPG. Cavs > Pacers.

In all seriously, PFF made my head hurt and made me lose some hope in humanity.
ball
__________________
Fail GM

AIM: junot111
NFB(Mike's league): Spurs GM


G.Vasquez - L. James - L. Kleiza - A. Nivins - B. Mullens
Iguodala
Atsur/Ukic-McGuire/Smith-Yi/Bargs-Haddadi/Dozier
Walker
Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 11:43 PM   #16 (permalink)
PFF
Senior Member
 
PFF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Naptown
Age: 17
Posts: 3,583   (View Stats)
Credits: 9,951
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krenzel16 View Post
So if we are going to do theories...

LeBron - 35 PPG
Mo - 25 PPG
Shaq- 20 PPG
West - 20 PPG
Z - 15 PPG
Andy V - 15 PPG
Parker -15 PPG
Moon 10 PPG
Bench - 15 PPG

160 PPG. Cavs > Pacers.

In all seriously, PFF made my head hurt and made me lose some hope in humanity.
No. Those are not realistic capabilities.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tech View Post
ball
This
__________________
PFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 PM.
vBulletin Skin by: Skeedio.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007 - 2008, PixelFX Studios
Ad Management plugin by RedTyger